Skip to content

New presentation on International Research Collaboration

© University of North Texas

The Global Research Forum, held at the University of North Texas, invited key university administrators, international research funding agencies, and doctoral students to establish an understanding of how to expand mutually beneficial global research cooperation, and support research-active faculty and graduate students with global research aspirations.

Maresi Nerad, director of CIRGE, was one of the panelists  to discuss the core elements of a research report, published by the National Academy of Science in 2011, Examining Core Elements of International Research Collaboration.

In her talk, she highlighted the main points of strengthening international research collaboration among universities. Trust is imperative in mutually beneficial international collaboration, however, this process takes time and Dr. Nerad warned that the collaboration via virtual platforms could be unsustainable without prior personal acquaintance.

In addition, Dr. Nerad elaborated that research collaborations involving students and postdocs require a comprehensive assessment framework. In her opinion, the formative  assessment work should start from the beginning in order to avoid tension that may be produced given the organizational structures, programs, and cultural behavior.

In this sense, the director of CIRGE was emphatic that graduate students and future researchers need to be prepared for international collaboration and need to be given room after returning from abroad to debrief on their experiences, and integrate the new knowledge and lessons learned into ongoing teaching and learning at their home campus.  This includes integrating international students as equal partners on the home campus.

See complete abstract and presentation

See more on Global Research Funding Forum

Tangible outcomes: Investigating International Collaboration at the Graduate Level

The collaborative work done by the participants of the workshop (professors in STEM fields,  educational researchers, graduate students and post doctoral fellows  from around the world), generated new publications and grants subsequent to the workshop.

  • Blumenfield T., Nerad M., 2012. International Assessment: Developing a Research Agenda for (Post) graduate Education and Collaboration. Australian Universities Review. Vol. 54.  No 1. 2012, pp. 72-83.
  • Culver Culver, S., Warfvinge, P., Grossman, C., & Puri, I.  (2011).  Evaluation of engineering   double-degree programs in Sweden:  Results of the Lund focus groups.  European Journal of Higher Education, 1, pp. 220-232.
  • Culver, S. M., Puri, I. K., Spinelli, G., DePauw, K. P., Dooley, J. E.  (2011). Collaborative dual-degree programs and value added for students:  Lesson learned through the Evaluate-E project.  Journal of Studies in International Education, pp.1-22.
  • Deardorff, D., de Wit, H., Heyl, J., &  Adams, T (eds). (2012). The Sage Handbook of  International Higher Education. California: Sage Publication.

Presentations: International Experience in STEM Graduate Education and Beyond

  •  The Evaluate-E Project: A brief overview. Presented by Steve Culver, Associate Director at the Office of Academic Assessment & Ishwar K. Puri, Professor and Department Head Engineering Science & Mechanics – Virginia Tech 

Investigating the International Experience in STEM Graduate Education and Beyond

© Tami Blumenfield

The program was designed to (a) increase our mutual understanding of essential topics relevant to investigating the impact of international collaborations at the (post) graduate level and beyond, (b) gather information on what we know and should know about assessing international experiences and programs, and (c) move collectively towards charting research directions for the coming years.

After 40 hours of dialogue and small work sessions, one important result of the workshop was coming to a consensus over key questions as priorities for further empirical research. Some of the critical research questions are illustrated below:

1. Does international collaboration lead to better science/scientists?
2. Do current institutional and funding structures lead to missed opportunities for international collaboration? If so, how?
3. How can we assess institutional preparedness for international  collaborations/ experiences?
4. What are the expected outcomes and goals of international experiences/collaborations? How are they established?
5. What are the actual impacts, outcomes, and transformations of the international experiences/collaborations?

Another outcome was the development of two assessment frameworks.

Further the workshop inspired a number of publications and grant proposals.

 See Final Report

See Presentations “Lightening Talks”

See Tangible Outcomes

Researchers:

Maresi Nerad and Tami Blumenfield. “Investigating the International Experiences in STEM Graduate Education and Beyond: Report from a Workshop to Develop a Research Agenda.” Center for Innovation and Research in Graduate Education, University of Washington. National Science Foundation Grant #105029.