Skip to content

The Cyclical Problems of Graduate Education and Institutional Responses in the 1990s

When in January, 1900, five university presidents–Charles William Eliot of Harvard, William Rainey Harper of Chicago, Benjamin Ide Wheeler of California,  Seth Low of Columbia, and Daniel Coit Gilman of Johns Hopkins–invited nine other United States university presidents to meet in the  following  month in  Chicago  for the purpose of forming a permanent organization devoted to  “matters of  common  interest  relating to graduate study,” none of them guessed that  graduate education would become a major enterprise in the United States.

Spearheaded by President Wheeler, this group of fourteen created the American Association of Universities (AAU)  and set out to unify  and improve the standards for the award of  higher degrees at American  universities. These  men had received  their  advanced education abroad, most of them in German universities–the world’s leading scholarly institutions at the turn of the century, and were eager to transplant the new form of scholarship they  encountered there into their own institutions, In so doing, they hoped to stem the flow of able graduate students abroad and attract them to American universities for advanced study  instead. Little did they know that some eighty years later graduate education in  the United States would  become a much sought after commodity and that students from countries all around the world, including Germany, would flock to American universities for their graduate education.

Nerad, M., June, R., & Miller, D. (1997). The Cyclical Problems of Graduate Education: Institutional Responses in the 1990s, In M. Nerad, R. June, & D. Miller, Graduate Education in the United States, pp. vii-xiv, New York: Garland Press.

Download: The Cyclical Problems of Graduate Education

Increasing Student Retention in Graduate and Professional Programs

Using the assessment model from the University of California Berkeley, describes how research can inform policies and strategies for increasing graduate student retention by focusing on the interplay of institutional, disciplinary and student characteristics.

Nerad, M.  &  Sands Miller, D. (1996). Increasing Student Retention in Graduate and Professional Programs.  In  Haworth, J. G. Assessment in Graduate and Professional Programs: Demand, Processes, Outcomes. ed. In  Jossey-Bass Publishers, no.92,  San Francisco, pp. 61-76.

Download: Increasing Student Retention in Graduate and Professional Programs

Beyond Traditional Modes of Mentoring

This chapter describes the four major strategies developed at the University of California Berkeley to assist faculty in advising graduate students. Examples of the strategies in action are included from the In Balance Program.

Nerad, M. (1995). Beyond Traditional Modes of Mentoring. In Nancy A Gaffney, Ed, A Conversation About Mentoring: Trends and Models,  Washington, D.C.: Council of Graduate Schools, pp. 18-24.

Download: Beyond Traditional Modes of Mentoring

Japanese Doctoral Education

This paper gives an overview of changes in Japan’s doctoral education programs, a more detailed look at changes in Germany’s doctoral programs and compares the new German program’s strengths and weaknesses to American doctoral education.  An earlier version of this paper was presented at an invitational seminar of the National Research Council, Office of Scientific and Engineering Personnel in June 1994.

Download: japan_germany.pdf

Using Time, Money, and Human Resources Efficiently and Effectively in the Case of Women Graduate Students

Interview data are presented shedding light on additional factors and concerns of woment graduate students that are related to lower participation in graduate studies and higher attrition.

Nerad, M. (1992). Paper presented at the conference, Science and Engineering Programs: On Target for Women? sponsored by the National Academy of Sciences/National Research Council/Office of Scientific and Engineering Personnel, March.  See also Science and Engineering Programs: On Target for Women? Marsha Lakes Matyas and Linda Skidmore Dix, eds. Washington D.C.: National Acacdemy Press (1992), 75-80

Download: Using Time, Money, and Human Resources Efficiently and Effectively in the Case of Women Graduate Students

 

Doctoral Education at the University of California and Factors Affecting Time-to-Degree

This study examined time-to-degree at the University of California in order to determine if students took longer on average to complete their doctoral degrees than they did 20 years ago. It presents factors which may have led to long time-to-degree, addresses underlying structural reasons for prolonged time-to-degree among all students and examines whether or not these factors influence ethnic minorities and women in particular.

Nerad, M. (1991) Doctoral Education at the University of California and Factors Affecting Time-to-Degree. In response to the California State Senate (SRC 66). Report to the Office of the President. Oakland, CA.

Download: Introduction and Parts I to VII    Bibliography, Tables and Appendices 

Assessing Doctoral Student Experience: Gender and Departmental Culture

This study investigated gender differences experienced by doctoral students at a major research university during 1987-88.  Clear differences emerged between how men and women assessed distribution of department resources and relationships with faculty, with women’s assessments being significantly more negative. Hierarchical regression analysis showed a relationship between positive departmental culture and time-to-degree for women and men in some fields.

Nerad, M. (1991). Assessing Doctoral Student Experience: Gender and Departmental Culture, Paper presented at the 31st Annual Conference of the Association for Institutional Research, San Francisco, May 26-29.

Download:  Assessing Doctoral Student Experience

From Facts to Action: Expanding the Education Role of the Graduate Division

Breaking out of its traditional administrative role, the Graduate Division at the University of California, Berkeley, undertook research and used the findings to design and implement programs which encouraged students to complete their degrees and to do so in a reasonable amount of time. An excellent example of how a graduate school can play an active role in improving graduate education.

Nerad, M., & Cerny, J. (1991).  From Facts to Action: Expanding the Education Role of the Graduate Division. Communicator, Special Edition – May.
Reprinted in  Leonard L Baird (ed), Increasing Graduate Student Retention and Degree Attainment, New Directions for Institutional Research No 80, Winter 1993, Jossey-Bass.

  Download:  From Facts to Action

 

A Second Look at Mentoring Graduate Students: Some Provocative Thoughts

While mentoring is recognized as highly beneficial, the traditional model of faculty mentoring carries high risks of failure and is not always feasible. Network mentoring and peer mentoring are promising alternatives.

Nerad, M. (1990) A Second Look at Mentoring Graduate Students: Some Provocative Thoughts. Presented at the University of California System-wide Graduate Division Conference, Monterey, CA, November 13.

Download: A Second Look at Mentoring

Easing the Way for Graduate Students

Easing the Way for Graduate Students: A Guide to Successful Departmental Activities in Support of Graduate Students, Graduate Division, University of California at Berkeley.

This comprehensive notebook was compiled for departmental chairs, graduate advisers, graduate assistants, and graduate students at UC Berkeley. It is intended to be a resource for all doctoral programs and a means for exchanging ideas for activities that help graduate students successfully complete their degree programs.

Contents and Introduction

Chapter I: Recruitment

How do departments attract the best students? What mechanisms do they use to inform students about requirements and offering? What factors make students decide to come to Berkeley? This section includes a sampling of departmental recruitment activities.

Chapter II: Orientation

Beginning a graduate program and becoming assimilated into the academic and social life of a department takes time and effort. This chapter contains a sampling of orientation programs.

Chapter III: Coursework

This section describes departmental mechanisms for keeping students in the PhD program—assisting them in meeting coursework and research requirements, and encouraging peer support and interaction.

Chapter IV: Oral Examinations

Since this examination is considered a major hurdle by most students and precipitates much stress and anxiety, this section includes departmental strategies to help students prepare for and survive the examination.

Chapter V: Research and Dissertation Writing

The dissertation-writing stage is difficult for students in all fields. Isolation is a common problem for students in the humanities, social sciences, and professional fields, and financial support is the exception rather than the rule. This section contains examples of workshops on dissertation-writing.

Chapter VI: Opportunities to Present Research

Presenting research is an integral part of the academic career. This chapter contains examples of events that provide students with opportunities to practice oral presentation skills.

Chapter VII: The Job Search

There are several components of the job search: identifying open positions; writing and presenting a research talk; constructing a curriculum vitae and forming a dossier; and preparing for an on-site job interview. This chapter contains examples of services offered by different departments.

Chapter VIII: The Graduate Student Handbook

This chapter contains examples of Graduate Student Handbooks that reflect a variety of approaches to providing information to students.