Skip to content

Social Science PhDs—Five+ Years Out: Communications Report

Communication PhDs find faculty positions more readily than doctorate holders in other social science fields. Whether in faculty positions or working in business, government, or non-profit sectors, the majority are satisfied with their jobs and career paths. When assessing careers from the perspective of balancing work and family, both men and women report problems combining work and family, but women delay parenting because of their career more often than men do. According to graduates’ assessments, communication PhD programs prepared them well for their careers. Jobs outside of academia are more likely than faculty positions to require skills in data analysis and synthesis, team collaboration, working in interdisciplinary contexts, and managing people and budgets. Most respondents rated their PhD programs as “excellent” in terms of academic rigor and training in critical thinking. However, major criticisms included a lack of training in skills important to obtaining and administering grants, less than adequate formal teaching training, and little guidance from mentors in publishing and in finding a job.

Hickerson, A., Rudd, E., Morrison, E.,  Picciano, J., & Nerad, M. (2008). Communicating the PhD Experience: Communication PhDs Five+ Years after Graduation. CIRGE Report 2008-03. CIRGE: Seattle, WA. www.cirge.washington.edu

 Download: Social Science PhDs—Five+ Years Out: Communications Report

Social Science PhDs—Five+ Years Out: Anthropology Report

Presents key findings from the Social Science PhDs—Five+ Years Out based on anthropology graduates’ views of the quality of training and on their career paths.  Offers evidence for the continuing relevance of PhD training for anthropologists’ careers and also suggests that programs and dissertation advisors leave students too much on their own when it comes to mastering practical skills and knowledge that would facilitate the transition from student to practicing professional in the actually existing labor markets for PhD anthropologists.

Rudd, E., Morrison, E., Picciano, J., & Nerad, M. (2008). Social Science PhDs—Five+ Years Out: Anthropology Report. CIRGE Report 2008-01.  CIRGE: Seattle, WA. www.cirge.washington.edu

Download: Anthropology Report

Social Science PhDs—Five+ Years Out: Spotlight on Doctoral Education #2: Professional Development for PhD Students: Do They Really Need It?

This analysis distinguishes between the PhD completion skills normally acquired in completing PhD research (critical thinking, data analysis and synthesis, writing and publishing, and research design) and the professional skills (working with diverse groups, working in interdisciplinary contexts, teamwork, presenting, grant writing, and managing people and budgets) that more and more PhD recipients are finding crucial to success in their employment.

Rudd, E., Nerad, M., Morrison, E.,  & Picciano, J.  (2008). Professional Development for PhD Students: Do They Really Need It? CIRGE Spotlight on Doctoral Education #2. CIRGE: University of Washington, Seattle, WA. www.cirge.washington.edu.

Download: CIRGE Spotlight on Doctoral Education #2: Professional Development for PhD Students: Do They Really Need It?

Social Science PhDs—Five+ Years Out: Spotlight on Doctoral Education #1: Finally Equal Footing for Women?

The first in a series of spotlights on hot issues in doctoral education, this report focuses on the potential for gender equality in careers of social science doctorate holders using findings from Social Science PhDs—Five+ Years Out, CIRGE’s most recent national survey.

Rudd, E., Morrison, E. Picciano, J., & Nerad, M. (2008). Finally equal footing for women in social science careers? CIRGE Spotlight on Doctoral Education #1. CIRGE: University of Washington, Seattle, WA. www.cirge.washington.edu.

Download: Spotlight on Doctoral Education #1: Finally Equal Footing for Women?

Social Science PhDs—Five+ Years Out: Sociology Report

Presents key findings from the Social Science PhDs—Five+ Years Out based on sociology graduates’ views of the quality of training and on their career paths. The sociologists in this study, like respondents in other fields, reported positive evaluations of their graduate training programs.  They rated their programs highly with respect to academic rigor and training in thinking critically. However, ratings were substantially lower for training in skills for presenting, writing, and publishing. The study suggests that sociologists from these cohorts encountered a relatively strong job market, especially as compared to historians and anthropologists. Sociology, the field in this study with the most women, is also the only field with clear evidence of gender inequalities in careers.

Morrison, E., Rudd, E., Nerad, M., & Picciano, J. (2008). Sociology Report: PhD Program Quality, Early Careers, and Gender Stratification. CIRGE Report 2008-05. CIRGE: Seattle, WA. www.cirge.washington.edu

Download: Social Science PhDs—Five+ Years Out: Sociology Report

The Changing Landscape of Work and Family in the American Middle Class: Reports from the Field

“In this beautifully rendered collection, we peer through so many different windows of American family life. Rural North Dakota parents reverently passing on farm values, if not the farm itself, to their children. Silicon Valley hi-tech family workers share long hours and high hopes in their electronic cottage. Affluent corporate executives and their stay-at-home wives still can’t control influences beyond the gates to their communities. Refugees from corporate life set up a small town pie shop hoping to find a better way to mix work and family life. The superb studies gathered here reflect the many ways families are trying to build the American Dream on an ever more eroded and shifting landscape.”—Arlie Hochschild, author of The Time Bind: The Commercialization of Intimate Life.

Rudd, E. & Descartes, L. (2008). The Changing Landscape of Work and Family in the American Middle Class: Reports from the Field. Lanham, MA: Lexington Books

 Not available for download

Doctoral Education in the United States of America

An overview of the history of graduate education in the United States, the current structure of graduate education at most US universities, recent challenges and changes within doctoral education and national responses to those challenges and changes.

 Nerad, Maresi. (2008). Doctoral Education in the United States of America. In Maresi Nerad, Toward a Global PhD? Forces and Forms in Doctoral Education Worldwide, p. 279-296, Seattle: University of Washington Press.

Download: Doctoral Education in the United States of America

Social Sciences PhDs – Five+ Years out survey

The Social Science PhDs—Five+ Years Out survey is CIRGE’s latest contribution to the PhD career path and retrospective program evaluation research. Funded by the Ford Foundation, Social Science PhDs—Five+ Years Out, surveyed PhD recipients who received their degrees between 1995 and 1999 from 65 U.S. universities in six disciplines—anthropology, communications, geography, history, political science, and sociology.

Investigators: Maresi Nerad, Elizabeth Rudd, Emory Morrison and Joseph Picciano

Download: Highlight Report

See note in Inside Higher Education

Finally Equal Footing for Women in Social Science Careers?

This CIRGE Spotlight focuses on the potential for gender equality in careers of social science doctorate holders using findings from Social Science PhDs–Five+ Years Out, CIRGE’s national study of recent graduates in six fields. We find surprising equality in early careers of men and women: men and women are equally likely to begin careers in a tenure-track position and equally likely to ever be on tenure track at Research 1 institutions. Yet we find that this equality of beginnings is unlikely to last over the course of these cohorts’ careers. Further, women seem to be “subsidizing” equality in PhD careers by paying higher personal costs than men do.

Rudd, E., Morrison, E., Picciano, J., &  Nerad, M. (2008). Finally equal footing for women in social science careers? CIRGE Spotlight on Doctoral Education #1. CIRGE: University of Washington, Seattle, WA.

Download: Finally Equal Footing for Women in Social Science Careers?

 

Equality and Illusion: Gender and Tenure in Art History Careers

Using a national survey of 508 art history PhDs including data on graduate school performance and careers 10-15 years post-PhD, this study investigates gender, family, and academic tenure in art history, the humanities field with the highest proportion of women. Alternative hypotheses derived from three perspectives–termed here clockwork, two-body, and synergy–are evaluated with multivariate logistic regression. Analysis finds that marriage increases men’s tenure odds and decreases women’s, but that some types of marriages do not decrease women’s odds, and some types dramatically increase men’s. This study calls for attention to male advantage in female-dominated academic disciplines and demonstrates the potential to better understand the interactions of gender, marriage, and careers by conceptualizing different types of marriages.

Rudd, E.,  Morrison, E.,  Sadrozinski, R.,  Nerad, M.,  & Cerny, J. (2008). Equality and illusion: Gender and tenure in art history careers. Journal of Marriage and Family, No 70, pp. 228-238.

Download: Equality and Illusion